In the Eye of the Beholder? UN and the Use of Drones to Protect Civilians

Authors

  • John Karlsrud Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
  • Frederik Rosén Danish Institute for International Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.bo

Keywords:

drones, peacekeeping, peacebuilding, humanitarian studies, protection of civilians, international humanitarian law

Abstract

The debate on the UN’s possible use of drones for peacekeeping took a turn in 2013 when the Security Council granted the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) permission to contract surveillance drones for MONUSCO, its peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
This article examines what drone capability may entail for UN peacekeeping missions. We find that surveillance drones can help missions acquire better information and improve the situational awareness of its troops, as well as inform decision-making by leadership, police, and civilian components of the mission. We see a significant potential in the use of surveillance drones to improve efforts to protect civilians, increase UN troops’ situational awareness, and improve access to vulnerable populations in high-risk theaters. The use of drones can dramatically improve information-gathering capacities in proximity to populations at risk, thereby strengthening the ability of peacekeepers to monitor and respond to human rights abuses as well as violations of international humanitarian law (IHL). Drones may also enable peacekeepers to maintain stealth surveillance of potential spoilers, including arms smugglers and embargo breakers. They could additionally improve UN forces’ own targeting practices, further contributing to the protection of civilians (PoC). Furthermore, we emphasize how drone capability significantly increases peacekeepers’ precautionary obligations under IHL in targeting situations: the availability of drones triggers the obligation to use them to gather information in order to avoid civilian casualties or other violations of IHL or international human rights law.
There may soon come a shift among human rights groups, from being skeptical of the use of drones by UN peacekeepers to demanding that peacekeeping operations be equipped with surveillance drones for humanitarian and human rights reasons – shifting the current debate, which has focused largely on the negative impact of the use of drones, to a more balanced debate that considers more objectively what drones are and what they can be used for. Finally, the debate about armed drones looms on the horizon for the UN as well – and we outline some of the key dilemmas that the inclusion of such a capability will entail.

Author Biographies

John Karlsrud, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs

John Karlsrud is a Research Fellow and Programme Manager of the Training for Peace programme, and Deputy Head of the Peace Operations and Peacebuilding Group at NUPI in Oslo, working on peacekeeping, peacebuilding and humanitarian issues. He has published peer-reviewed articles in, among other publications, Conflict, Security and DevelopmentInternational Peacekeeping, Journal of Peacebuilding and DevelopmentGlobal Governance and Global Responsibility to Protect. He previously served as Special Assistant to the UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General to Chad and has done research in Chad, Haiti, and South Sudan.

Frederik Rosén, Danish Institute for International Studies

Frederik Rosén holds a PhD in Political Science and is a Project Researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen. He has published widely in international journals on state and peacebuilding and various aspects of international conflict and security management. He has previously conducted empirical research on capacity development in Afghanistan. 

Downloads

Published

2013-06-21

Issue

Section

Research Article